Upstream BC Industrial Development and Gutting of Canadian Environmental
Laws Pose Major Threats to Salmon and Clean Water in Alaska
By Carl Wassilie, Alaska Big Village Network, Ramsey Hart, MiningWatch Canada, Chris Zimmer, Rivers Without Borders Censored News
http://www.bsnorrell.blogspot.com
(ANCHORAGE) The Idle No More grassroots protest movement that started
in the province of Saskatchewan has stretched across Canada and
is now being joined by Alaskans who are concerned about the threats
to Alaskan waters and salmon from British Columbia’s (BC) aggressive
industrial development plans. Indigenous Peoples and supporters
will host an Idle No More rally at Town Square Park downtown Anchorage
at noon on Friday, January 11th.
“We would like to show solidarity with our indigenous brothers and
sisters in Canada that are facing the same issues our tribal peoples
are faced with here in Alaska,” said Delice Calcote of Alaska
Inter-Tribal Council. “Our mission is to protect customary and
traditional use of our subsistence resources. Protect our subsistence
or expect resistance.”
This demonstration is more than just a show of solidarity with
Indigenous activists in Canada. Participants are also hoping to raise
awareness about the fact that BC’s major industrial development plans
and drastic changes to Canadian environmental laws also pose serious
risks to salmon, water quality and traditional uses in the Southeast
Alaska/Northwest BC transboundary region.
Carl Wassilie of Alaska's Big Village Network said that “Native
and non-native Alaskans need to stand up and be counted when it comes
to protecting our water, salmon, and indigenous people’s rights.
Our representatives are shirking their responsibilities and largely
ignoring the threats to our resources from Canada’s massive rush to
industrial development in the headwaters of major salmon rivers like
the Taku, Stikine and Unuk and weakening of important environmental
protection laws. History tells us ignoring this is a bad idea.”
The Idle No More movement was sparked by changes to laws that protected
all of Canada’s “navigable” waterways and that govern
Indigenous land tenure. Recent changes to the Environmental Assessment
Act, Fisheries Act and Navigable Waters Protection Act mean there will
be substantially less federal oversight over decisions about major industrial
developments, such as the many mines, roads and hydro-electric
projects that are proposed on the BC side of the border. Many of these
projects would have direct impacts on rivers that provide drinking water
and salmon to Alaskans. The most recent changes are but part of
a larger pro-industrial development agenda that is being implemented
without meaningful consultation with the Indigenous peoples of Canada.
“Federal oversight of mining in Canada hasn’t been perfect, but
it has played an important role in reducing risks to the environment,”
said Ramsey Hart of MiningWatch Canada. “Recent weakening of
environmental regulations is taking us in the wrong direction, which
increases the threat that poorly planned and risky projects going forward
on a massive scale will pollute Alaskan waters, harm salmon and threaten
the livelihoods of Alaskans who depend on these resources. Alaskans
have reason to be concerned about what’s proposed in the headwaters
of rivers like the Taku, Stikine and Unuk.”
BC mining operations have a history of polluting U.S. waters.
For example, acid mine drainage from the Tulsequah Chief mine
has been leaking into the Tulsequah and Taku rivers for over 50 years.
Pollution from a smelter in Trail, BC ended up in Lake Roosevelt, in
the Washington state portion of the Columbia River.
“The BC government and the mining industry have shown little
regard for downstream interests in Alaska,” said Chris Zimmer of Rivers
Without Borders. "The double whammy of massive industrial development
and the gutting of environmental laws is the biggest threat to water
quality and salmon in major transboundary wild salmon rivers like the
Taku, Stikine and Unuk we have seen in decades. We need our elected
leaders to immediately engage with Canada to ensure that Canada’s
actions do not harm our interests.”
No comments:
Post a Comment