Indigenous Peoples and Human Rights

June 6, 2012

An Indian on Colorado River 'Obama's Broken Promises'

Open Letter to Obama: When will you meet with the tribal governments along the Colorado River?

"Many Native Americans felt that your tenure would be different, that things could really change for Indian Peoples in America. I was one of them. Now, these specific promises are broken, and these energy projects are being placed on sacred sites—these patterns and practices have destroyed much of that hope."

By Indigenous Reflections
Posted with permission at Censored News
http://indigenousreflections.wordpress.com/2012/05/30/open-letter-to-obama-when-will-you-meet-with-the-tribal-governments-along-the-colorado-river/

Dear President Obama,

I hope this message finds you and your family well. Unfortunately, I write to you with heavy heart about an important issue that I seek your assistance on. As I type this letter, an important part of the spiritual ancestry of some of the Tribal Governments in Southern California is being desecrated with heavy machinery, all in the name of renewable energy. These same Tribal Governments have sought counsel with your administration. Unfortunately, these efforts did not produce any meetings or dialogues between your staff in Washington and the elected representatives of these Indian Nations. I write to see if you would come to the table and meet with these Native officials.
The ironic aspect to this current situation, regarding renewable energy projects, is that renewable energy is based upon some of the same fundamental principles that are essential to many traditional Indigenous spiritual ways—specifically, maintaining a healthy and sustainable relationship with Mother Earth. The modern exploitation of the earth— specifically ripping up the land for fossil fuels, only to extract its carbon and pollute the atmosphere—is a practice that many of our collective ancestors have warned the world about its perils centuries ago. Global warming, the product in part of unsustainable energy practices, is now being validated by Western scientists and climate change has become a worldwide concern.
I understand that domestic energy, and in particular the development of renewable energy, is an important part of your re-election campaign. On the surface, that appears to be a healthy initiative—having the American Nation be more accountable about how it produces energy and how it may help slow or reduce its carbon footprint. But the many renewable energy projects born out of this initiative have bombarded the undisturbed traditional lands of many Indian Nations. What was once a tool of improving this shared world of ours for future generations has turned into a machine that is destroying the history of our Peoples, written into the land by our past generations.
What is alarming is the “fast-track” process these projects have forced upon. These projects are placed in areas that are, culturally and archaeologically, unsuited for utility scale energy production. The environmental review process has been arbitrarily fast, often lacking the necessary studies and documents. Requests for more time or more review were rejected outright. Even your own Secretary of Interior has described this process of promoting these renewable energy projects as being “on steroids”. In short, these projects have taken priority over the process.
These fast-track projects, such as Genesis Solar and the recently approved Ocotillo Wind, have blitzed through the concerns of Tribal Governments. The Native Americans told the BLM that Ford Dry Lake held cultural materials—and soon after grading began, bunches and bunches of manos and metates, previously left intact by our ancestors many generations ago, were dug up by belly scrapers. In fact, post cultural destruction, the BLM and NextEra, the developer, admitted that they all knew there was cultural materials there—and yet, both felt secure in developing over these sites. Secretary Salazar approved the Ocotillo Wind Project in an area that, arguably, is even archaeologically richer area than Genesis Solar—where an archaeological site is so big and saturated, that it is referred to as the “mega site” by archaeologists—and slowly and surely, more cremation sites there are being “discovered” as this project progresses. This is besides the fact that in the federal government’s own land planning initiative in 1980, the California Desert Conservation Act, the federal government recognized both these areas as culturally sensitive areas and made maps demonstrating these concerns. Yet, the Department of Interior turned a blind eye to that existing information they held in their hands.
Yes, there were meetings between the BLM and Tribal Governments. But what did those meetings produce? There weren’t any meetings with Tribal Governments and the final decision maker, Secretary Salazar or yourself, despite the repeated requests by Tribal Governments for a simple audience. Almost all the Tribal Governments flatly said, “These places should not be disturbed. When will ‘NO’ be enough?!” Instead, the developers all got green lights to construct. These meetings were not a “consultation”, in any meaning of the word. Instead, they were a mere formality, a box to check for the BLM to say, “Yes, we met with the Indians.” There were meetings, but our voices weren’t heard and our cultural resources received no protections.
When will our heritage, spirituality, ancestry, and culture be protected and respected?
Along those lines, I have written to ask you: Why haven’t you spoken with these Tribal Governments? Why hasn’t Secretary Salazar met with these elected officials? Where is the meaningful “government-to-government” consultation? Can the Tribal Governments along the Colorado River expect you to keep your promises to them? What happened to the promises you made to these Tribal Governments?
We know that you and your administration have had plenty of opportunities to respond to the Tribal Governments’ specific requests. I know of three Tribal Governments (Colorado River Indian Tribe, Quechan Indian Tribe, and Viejas Band of the Kumeyaay Nation) that have specifically written to you on these matters, but with no response from your office. Secretary Salazar has been all over the country, touting the jobs and energy the Department of Interior has produced—and yet, he does not have the time to come to the Colorado Desert. Secretary Salazar visited Gila Bend, but he wasn’t able to go a little further west to meet with the Tribal Governments of Quechan or Cocopah; Secretary Salazar paid a visit to the San Diego zoo, and yet there was no time to meet with the Kumeyaay Tribal Governments 30 minutes away.
The news reports you being able to meet with your family at the Crow Nation. Maintaining family relationships is important, and I am happy you have been able to keep good relationships with your Crow brothers and sisters. But, what about your other families in Southern California and along the Colorado River? You seem, personally, like a nice person, and I’m sure many of the Indian Nations around the Colorado Desert would welcome you into their homes. But, until you can meet with these Peoples, and their Governments—and possibly talk about the difficult matters that need to be discussed—these relationships cannot be fostered.
What is sad about this predicament is that, for better or worse, I viewed you as a man of your word. I am neither a Democrat nor Republican—I am not registered with any party; I vote for whom I think will help our peoples and this land. However, I was completely impressed with your platform on Native Americans. I read your 2008 campaign website, and I was moved. I don’t remember any presidential campaign that included a (positive) Native American platform. You had issued a document, “Barack Obama’s Principles for Stronger Tribal Communities”, which included many positive hallmarks, such as not neglecting the federal responsibility to Tribal Governments and treating these governments as sovereign entities. For myself and other Native Americans, there was hope in your campaign.
I also remember the many progressive promises you made to Tribal Governments, specifically on the government-to-government relationships you wanted to promote between the federal government and Tribal Governments. Many Indian elected officials were pleased to hear that you indicated that Tribal Governments have “been ignored by Washington too long”, and that the “President of the United States [needs to be] meeting on a regular basis with the Native American leadership and ensuring relationships of dignity and respect.” And at a forum for Tribal Governments, in November of 2009, you made promises about meeting with Tribal Governments, that “[t]his conference will serve as part of the ongoing and important consultation process that I value, and further strengthen the nation-to-nation relationship,” and ensure that Native Americans have a “strong voice” in your administration.
Unfortunately, starting in 2011 and now in 2012, several renewable energy projects have begun destroying the spiritual landscape of some Indian Nations. Where is the dignity and respect in that? Tribal Governments have pleaded at every level of the federal government, including with your office, for help, assistance, or even for just an ear to listen—all with no meaningful response. Where is the strong voice in that? Indian elders have shown the federal government that certain lands are sacred, that they contain strong spiritual materials, that they are not appropriate for any type of renewable energy project—and yet those elders were ignored and the projects keep coming. Where is the hope in that?
Most Native Americans understand that you are a politician and that you have tough decisions to make. We recognize that almost all of your decisions will upset some of the people some of the time. And, certainly, you didn’t campaign on a full Native American platform. In the end, we know that there are issues that we may not see eye-to-eye on. We are savvy enough to comprehend that. Nonetheless, you did make specific promises to Native Americans. We were hopeful that your promises did not ring hallow, as has been the reputation of promises made by the federal government and by several past presidents. But, as you hopefully may have learned from your Crow family, communication and trust are very important in the Indian community. Without having the former, you cannot in good faith expect the latter.
At this point, much hope is lost: tears have been shed, hearts have been hurt, and souls hang low. You made specific promises to all Tribal Governments. Many Native Americans felt that your tenure would be different, that things could really change for Indian Peoples in America. I was one of them. Now, these specific promises are broken, and these energy projects are being placed on sacred sites—these patterns and practices have destroyed much of that hope.
One of my friends in the Democratic Party told me, “Just wait for next year. He’ll come around to help the Native Americans.” For better or worse, my Western-inclined thinking was already aware of that possibility. Maybe the Native Americans can deal with these renewable energy projects for just this year. But next year! That’ll be different! All the president needs are these projects, as part of his re-election campaign, and once he’s elected, he’ll come help the Indians!
As tempting a scenario as that is, it is a dream, to be honest, that is tainted in blood. The sacred sites and funerary remains that are being sacrificed for someone else’s solar panels are not worth any amount of promises. The damage being done this year, now as I write, is invaluable and irreplaceable. If you were to ask a non-Indian, “Can I dig up the graves of your grandfathers and grandmothers for a certain sum of cash, or for promises next year?” Would anyone in their right mind agree to that?
I don’t know how Mr. Romney feels about these developments. Tribal Government will have to consult with him separately. At this point, these issues are extra-political—they don’t relate to political parties, re-election/election campaigns, or campaign platforms. These are spiritual issues. They are about cremation sites where ancestors have been put to rest thousands of years ago, only to be uprooted in a matter of seconds by a bulldozer. They are about spiritual landscapes of sacred mountains that have existed since time immemorial, mentioned in Creation Stories, only to be obstructed by wind turbines that will help a couple of generations of people, but will scar the desert land forever.
Mr. Obama, I want to write to you in a good way; I want to keep hope alive; and I want to reach out to you with an open heart. So, with humility, I would like to ask you again: Will you meet with the Tribal Governments along the Colorado River? If you say yes, regardless of the destruction that has already happened, these Peoples will welcome you to the table—that is their way. All you have to say is yes you can.
Sincerely,
An Indian along the Colorado River

Colville rally over US $193 million settlement



Colville members rally to discuss the $193 million settlement

By Yvonne Swan yvonneswan1@gmail.com
Connie McCraigie, Omak, Wash.

Posted at Censored News
http://www.bsnorrell.blogspot.com/2012/06/colville-rally-over-us-193-million.html
NESPELEM, Wash. -- Colville tribal members will rally at an outdoor encampment on the baseball field at the Colville Indian agency campus at Nespelem, Washington to share valid concerns and strong opinions regarding the recent $193 Million settlement between the United States government and the Colville Business Council over federal mismanagement of land and resources on the Colville Reservation. Discussion will begin at noon Saturday, June 9th in preparation for a future meeting with the Colville Business Council (Council). This rally will continue throughout the day and into Sunday, June 10th.

Tribal elders from across the Reservation and outlying areas mandated this gathering out of concern that members are being disrespected and misrepresented by elected tribal leaders. Members were put at a disadvantage because vital information was given out at hastily-called district meetings following the February announcement of the historic settlement agreement.

Rumors and piece-meal information is not acceptable regarding this and other important matters pertaining to the Colville tribal membership.

The 14-member Council elect was well within its duties and obligations when it filed a claim on behalf of the 9,000-plus tribal members against the United States for violation of federal trust responsibility in 2005, and for seeing it through to final settlement; however, the Council should have stopped there and allowed for en masse consultation with the people as to what was to be done with the monetary settlement rather than go to the press and announce it was giving the membership 20% of the claim.

Members are encouraged to bring camping equipment and extra chairs, and food to share with those who are experiencing financial hardship.

June 4, 2012

China reports US human rights violations of Native Americans, migrants and Occupy Movement

China reports US human rights violations of Native Americans, migrants and Occupy Movement

By Brenda Norrell
Censored News
http://bsnorrell.blogspot.com/2012/06/china-reports-us-human-rights.html

In its report on human rights in the United States, China says the US is overly critical of human rights violations in nearly 200 countries of the world, while turning a “blind eye” and keeping silent about its own human rights violations.

The human rights crisis in the US includes the violation of Native American rights, brutalizing of the Occupy Movement and racial discrimination toward migrants. The US violations include discrimination toward women and ethnic Americans, and the high number of civilian deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan.

“In the United States, the violation of citizens' civil and political rights is severe. It is lying to itself when the United States calls itself the land of the free,” China said describing the Occupy Movement.

The State Council Information Office of the People's Republic of China released the report on May 25, "The Human Rights Record of the United States in 2011."

China describes the high unemployment, lack of health care, child poverty, homelessness, Internet spying on citizens, and failure to protect freedom of the press in the US. The high rates of violence, hate crimes, solitary confinement in prisons, and the imprisonment of civil rights activists are documented.
US denies Native Americans rights
“Native Americans are denied their due rights,” China said, pointing out that American Indians were forced to speak English in schools during forced assimilation, and today Native languages are at risk of disappearing.

Human rights violations of Native Americans include religious freedom, unjust incarcerations and racial discrimination in employment.

China describes how UN Special Rapporteur James Anaya lodged two accusations against the United States, including the use of recycled wastewater for commercial ski operations on the San Francisco Peaks, pointing out that it is “a site considered sacred by several Native American tribes.”

The second was the case of Leonard Peltier. “Peltier was sentenced to life in prison in 1977 for alleged murder of two FBI agents. However Peltier has been claiming he is innocent and persecuted by the U.S. government for participating in the American Indian Movement.”

China points out that two UN Rapporteurs lodged complaints against the U.S, stating that the city of Vallejo, California, is planning to level and pave over the Sogorea Te, held sacred to indigenous people in northern California, in order to construct a parking lot and public restrooms.

Describing the racial discrimination and unemployment in the US, China pointed to South Dakota.

“In Ziebach County of South Dakota, a community mainly composed of native-Americans, more than 60 percent of the residents live at or below the poverty line, and unemployment rate hits 90 percent in the winter (The Daily Mail, February 15, 2011.)”

Occupy Movement: Bruised and Bloodied
China said the Occupy movement tested the political, economic and social systems in the US, and the occupiers were treated in a rude and violent way, with extensive arrests. China points out that 700 protesters were arrested on the Brooklyn Bridge alone. Citing arrests in other cities, and how occupiers were bloodied and brutalized by police, China included the shooting of Marine Scott Olsen at Occupy Oakland.

“At least 85 people were arrested when police used teargas and baton rounds to break up an Occupy Wall Street camp in Oakland, California on October 25. An Iraq war veteran had a fractured skull and brain swelling after being allegedly hit in the head by a police projectile.”

China said the reasons for the Occupy Movement included the unequal distribution of wealth and high unemployment in the US.

Further, China says the US has failed to protect press freedom. During the forcible evacuation of Zuccotti Park, pepper spray was used on reporters. About 200 journalists were arrested.

China also points out bias in the US media.

“On October 15, 2011, when the Occupy Wall Street movement evolved to be a global action, CNN and Fox News gave no live reports on it, in a sharp contrast to the square protest in Cairo, for which both CNN and Fox News broadcast live 24 hours.”

Racism toward migrants in the US
China also describes the racial discrimination in the US, inequality in hiring, bullying in schools, and the abuse of migrants.

Illegal immigrants suffer ferocious maltreatments. Internal reports from the Office of Detention Oversight of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) revealed grave problems in many U.S. detention facilities for immigrants, including lack of medical care, the use of excessive force and "abusive treatment" of detainees (The Houston Chronicle, October 10, 2011). A report released on September 21, 2011, by an Arizona-based non-profit organization revealed that thousands of illegal immigrants detained across the border between Mexico and Arizona are generally maltreated by U.S. border police, being denied enough food, water, medical care and sleep, even beaten up and confined in extreme coldness or heat, suffering both psychological abuse and threats of death (The World Journal, September 24, 2011).

US spying, poverty, imprisonment and wars
In its description of spying on Internet users, China points out the US develops false identities to control conversations on social networks and tracks people using key words on Twitter.

China describes the wealth of US Congressmen and the failure of Congress. The abuse of power by law enforcement in the US, the shooting of people with toy guns and lengthy wrongful imprisonments are also listed.

“Abuse of power, brutal enforcement of law and overuse of force by U.S. police has resulted in harassment and hurt to a large number of innocent citizens and have caused loss of freedom of some people or even deaths.”

China also points out the high rate of imprisonment and prison isolation in the US. The UN Rapporteur on Torture was twice denied visits in 2011 with people in isolation. There are 20,000 to 25,000 people in prison isolation in the US.

“The U.S. remains the country with the largest ‘prison population’ and the highest per capita level of imprisonment in the world, and the detention centers' conditions are terrible.”

As for unemployment in the US, China points out that unemployment in the US in 2011 was the highest in 60 years. In the past three years, the rate of people who did not have enough money to buy food jumped from nine to 19 percent. There are 2.3 to 3.5 million homeless in America.

However, the wealthiest 400 Americans have 1.5 trillion U.S. dollars worth of assets.

Ethnic Americans are badly discriminated against when it comes to employment. It was reported that the unemployment rate of Hispanics rose to 11 percent in 2010 from 5.7 percent in 2007 (The New York Times, September 28, 2011). The unemployment rate of African Americans was 16.2 percent. For black males, it is at 17.5 percent; and for black youth, it is nearly 41 percent, 4.5 times the national average unemployment rate (CBS News, June 19, 2011). Nationally, black joblessness stands at 21 percent, rising to as high as 40 percent in major urban centers like Detroit (The Wall Street Journal, August 31, 2011).
China begins its report by saying that the US could protect its citizens from soaring rates of violent crimes, but doesn’t. The US is the leader in the developed world for gun violence and gun deaths, with high rates of personal gun ownership.

China says the trampling of human rights globally is shown in the high numbers of civilian deaths and the body counts of its wars:

The U.S.-led wars, albeit alleged to be "humanitarian intervention" efforts and for "the rise of a new democratic nation," created humanitarian disasters instead. For Iraqis, the death toll in the U.S.-initiated Iraq war stands at 655,000 (Tribune Business News, December 15, 2011). According to figures released by the Iraq Body Count, at least 103,536 civilians were killed in the Iraq war (Reuters, December 18, 2011). In 2011, there were an average of 6.5 deaths per day from suicide attacks and vehicle bombs (www.iraqbodycount.org). It is estimated that civilian casualties in the military campaign in Afghanistan could exceed 31,000 (Tribune Business News, October 17, 2011).
China concludes its report with these words:

The above-mentioned facts are but a small yet illustrative enough fraction of the United States' dismal record on its human rights situation. The United States' own tarnished human rights record has made it in no condition, on moral, political or legal basis, to act as the world's "human rights justice," to place itself above other countries and release the Country Reports on Human Rights Practices year after year to accuse and blame other countries. We hereby advise the U.S. government once again to look squarely at its own grave human rights problems, to stop the unpopular practices of taking human rights as a political instrument for interference in other countries' internal affairs, smearing other nations' images and seeking its own strategic interests, and to cease using double standards on human rights and pursuing hegemony under the pretext of human rights.

--------------------------
Special thanks to AIM West for providing Censored News with a copy of China's human rights report

To repost this article, contact:
brendanorrell@gmail.com

Protect Columbia River from Liquified Natural Gas

Photo Columbia River Keepers
Action Alert!
Oregon Liquified Natural Gas to Hold Open House About LNG Export Plans

By Daniel Serres
Posted at Censored News
http://bsnorrell.blogspot.com/2012/06/protect-columbia-river-from-liquified.html

Hello Everyone:
As we’ve anticipated for some time, Oregon Liquified Natural Gas is ramping up its promotion of a plan to export LNG through Oregon.  Oregon LNG refers to its project as “bi-directional," but we all know that Oregon LNG’s new proposal is a clear bait-and-switch.   In 2004, Oregon LNG argued that Oregon needed to import LNG from overseas.  Now, Oregon LNG intends to export huge volumes of natural gas to Asian markets through rural Oregon, Warrenton, and our Columbia River.
On Tuesday, June 12th, Oregon LNG plans to hold an Open House in Warrenton, Oregon to discuss its plans.  This Open House is not a FERC hearing.  FERC does not plan to attend.  Rather, Oregon LNG will likely use this Open House to promote its terminal and pipeline in one-on-one conversations with attendees.
We encourage people to attend, to wear your red “NO LNG” shirt, to ask tough questions about LNG exports, and to inform your neighbors and friends about the threat that Oregon LNG poses to Clatsop County.  Together, we can send a strong message that the people of Clatsop County, who successfully defeated Bradwood LNG, are ready and willing to fight Oregon LNG’s export proposal.
 What: Oregon LNG Open House
 When: Tuesday, June 12th, 6:30 pm - 8:30 pm
 Where:  Gateway Masonic Lodge #175, 66 SW 4th Avenue, Warrenton, Oregon
 Who: Oregon LNG is holding this Open House. It is not a formal hearing or a FERC event. 
 Why: We should attend to be a visible presence of opposition.  Oregon LNG is trying to pull a quick bait-and-switch and flip its project from import to export.  While the Open House is being orchestrated by Oregon LNG, we can use the opportunity to talk to our friends, neighbors and attendees to get more people informed and engaged.
Looking Ahead:  For months, we’ve expected a new export proposal from Oregon LNG.  In response, we will need to ramp up our opposition efforts to ensure that the project does not proceed in its new form.  FERC will be holding formal public hearings in coming months: we will inform all of our members when actual federal hearings occur. 
Columbia Riverkeeper and Columbia-Pacific Common Sense will be holding our own informational meetings in late June, once we have more tangible information about Oregon LNG's new proposal.  Stay tuned for more information about our event.
Look for more information on www.columbiariverkeeper.org about upcoming hearings and events regarding Oregon LNG’s major export proposal.
Contact: Dan Serres, Columbia Riverkeeper,  Phone: (503) 890-2441  Email: dan@columbiariverkeeper.org
 (official announcement from Oregon LNG)
 COLUMBIA PRESS
 OREGON LNG
OPEN HOUSE ANNOUNCEMENT
 Oregon LNG and Oregon Pipeline Company invite you to attend a public information meeting regarding a proposal to construct a liquefied natural gas (LNG) bi-directional terminal in Warrenton, Oregon and a natural gas pipeline commencing at the outlet of the LNG terminal and extending to a connection with an interstate pipeline system near Woodland, Washington.
 The meeting will be held:
When:    June 12th, 2012, 6:30pm-8:30pm
Where:   Gateway Masonic Lodge #175
             66 SW 4th Avenue
             Warrenton, Oregon
Daniel Serres
Conservation Director
(503) 890-2441

Navajo Water: Calvin Johnson: Praise for Navajo Human Rights Commission

Protesting Navajo water meeting in Phoenix.
Photo Vincent Yazzie
Praise for Navajo Human Rights Commission for resolution verifying that Little Colorado River water settlement is violation of Dine' rights

By Calvin Johnson, Navajo
Censored News
http://bsnorrell.blogspot.com/2012/06/navajo-water-calvin-johnson-praise-for.html

I applaud the Navajo Nation Human Rights Commission’s recent stance on the Navajo-Hopi Little Colorado River Water Rights Settlement Act of 2012. On May 21, 2012 the NNHRC passed a resolution vehemently rejecting the NHLCRWRS.
The NNHRC clearly understands that the Dine voices are being ignored and the Navajo people overwhelmingly do not want Navajo-Hopi Little Colorado River Water Rights Settlement Act of 2012 enacted.

On May 30 and 31, 2012 the Navajo Nation had a work session titled “Litigation Update and Water Rights Settlement” at the Lewis and Roca law offices in downtown Phoenix. Our leaders are having meetings far away from the public as if the bill and the settlement agreement are not plain or stated enough. This shows that our leaders still do not know the simple definitions of waive, release, time immemorial, injury, quality, resolve, funding. Very disappointing.
Phoenix water meeting of Navajo Nation protested.
Photo Vincent Yazzie.

We as a nation should respect, honor and protect the four sacred elements of life, air, light/fire, water and earth/pollen in all their forms for they sustain life and we are doing just that by opposing Navajo-Hopi Little Colorado River Water Rights Settlement Act of 2012 in its entirely.

To all my indigenous brothers and sisters, keep up the good work of standing up for our precious sacred water. Continue to encourage our elected officials to rejected any land and water grabbing legislations such as NHLCRWRS.

Navajo Human Rights Commission: Water rights settlement violates Dine' human rights
The Navajo Nation Human Rights Commission Resolution states that the water rights settlement for the Little Colorado River violates Dine' human rights:
Calvin Johnson
PO Box 5527
Leupp, AZ 86035