Indigenous Peoples and Human Rights

May 8, 2022

Mohawk Mothers Turn to Courts in Search for Unmarked Graves at CIA Torture Research Hospital in Montreal


Kahentinetha and Karennatha are part of the group of Mohawks behind the request for an immediate halt to the redevelopment of the former Royal Victoria Hospital. PHOTO DENIS GERMAIN, SPECIAL COLLABORATION

A group of Mohawks who seek justice suspect the presence of unmarked graves at the site Former Royal Victoria Hospital

'No work until careful excavation'


By Lea Carrier
English translation from the French La Presse
Censored News
French original La Presse

Mohawks are turning to the courts to force McGill University and the City of Montreal to suspend work on the former Royal Victoria Hospital until archaeological excavations have been carried out there. In addition, they demand that Mount Royal, at the foot of which the site is located, be recognized as the “inalienable” land of the Mohawks.

“We want the truth. The whole truth,” said Kahentinetha, one of six applicants for the injunction against McGill University, the City of Montreal, the Société québécoise des infrastructures (SQI) and the Government of Canada.

May 7, 2022

National Attorneys Organization Battling Police Brutality Supports Standing Rock Water Protectors in Federal Appeals Court


Police brutality at Standing Rock 2016.

National Attorneys Organization, Battling Police Brutality, Supports Standing Rock Water Protectors in Federal Appeals Court


Brenda Norrell
Censored News
May 7, 2022

The National Police Accountability Project, composed of attorneys nationwide, has filed in federal appeals court in support of Standing Rock Water Protectors. The attorneys told the court that the force used against Water Protectors was "unreasonably excessive," and violated their Fourth Amendment right, which protects people from unreasonable search and seizure by the government.

"NPAP agrees with the argument of appellants that the force used was unreasonably excessive and in violation of appellants’ Fourth Amendment rights," NPAP said in its summary in the 32-page amicus brief filed in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in North Dakota on April 29, 2022.

The attorneys' organization defends peaceful protesters, including those at George Floyd protests, who have been injured by tear gas, bean bags shot out of shotguns, rubber bullets and other munitions fired by law enforcement.

May 6, 2022

NCAI Files Amicus Brief in Support of Critically Injured Water Protectors at Standing Rock




Standing Rock Water Protectors Attacked by Law Enforcement. Photo copyright Ryan Vizzions.

The National Congress of American Indians filed a friends of the court brief in federal appeals court, upholding Treaty rights, and the right of free speech, in support of critically injured Water Protectors at Standing Rock.

By Brenda Norrell
Censored News


The National Congress of American Indians filed an amicus brief in federal appeals court in support of Standing Rock Water Protectors who were seriously injured by militarized law enforcement while defending the water from Dakota Access Pipeline.

Upholding Water Protectors' Treaty rights, and right to free speech, NCAI described how the peaceful and prayerful movement was met by serious, life-threatening force by law enforcement, resulting in critical injuries.

NCAI urged the appeals court to uphold Native American rights and said this excessive force should not be allowed to silence Native people exercising their rights.

"If the excessive force used to silence Plaintiffs-Appellants’ protected speech stands, the ability of all NCAI member Tribal Nations to peacefully exercise their First Amendment rights -- without risking injury from life threatening, excessive police force -- will be greatly undermined."

"NCAI therefore has a unique interest in advocating for the affirmance of the constitutional rights of Plaintiffs-Appellants to peacefully speak in support of tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, and the protection of Native American sacred sites and burials.'"

The amicus brief, known as a friend of the court brief, was filed in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, in the case of Vanessa Dundon, et al, versus Morton County Sheriff Kyle Kirchmeier, et all, on April 29, 2022.

NCAI said, "The Native youth at Standing Rock who began the Movement are familiar with the history of violence inflicted on their people, but they began the Movement with hope by taking a peaceful, prayerful 'stand to be the voice for [their] community, for [their] great grandparents, and for Mother Earth.'"

"These Native youth inspired Plaintiffs-Appellants, and thousands of others (Native and non Native) who decided to join them in Cannon Ball, just one mile north of the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation. For six months, they engaged in a peaceful, prayerful protest — all the while demanding that the United States, specifically the Army Corps, uphold the treaty rights of the SRST and refuse to allow a private company, Dakota Access, LLC ('Dakota Access'), to build its pipeline."

Standing Rock 2016. Copyright Ryan Vizzions.


"Appellants and thousands of other peaceful protestors advocated for the SRST’s treaty rights in a clear exercise of their First Amendment rights. In response to this peaceful protest, law enforcement used force."

"The question, of course, is whether that use of force was excessive and whether it violated the rights of Plaintiffs-Appellants.

"It is undisputed that Plaintiffs-Appellees suffered serious bodily harm and injury. Their exercise of their First Amendment rights was, in fact, met with serious force and, in some cases, life-threatening force."

"If the excessive force used to silence Plaintiffs-Appellants’ protected speech stands, the ability of all NCAI member Tribal Nations to peacefully exercise their First Amendment rights—without risking injury from life threatening, excessive police force—will be greatly undermined."

"NCAI therefore has a unique interest in advocating for the affirmance of the constitutional rights of Plaintiffs-Appellants to peacefully speak in support of tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, and the protection of Native American sacred sites and burials.'

'For the following reasons, NCAI respectfully requests that this Court reverse the District Court’s granting of Defendants-Appellees’ Motion for Summary Judgment below."

NCAI told the Appeals Court that the Movement had broad support from Indian Country. In all, 356 separate Tribal Nations sent their flags to fly at the site where the peaceful protestors camped, and nearly 300 Tribal Nations passed resolutions or wrote letters of support for Standing Rock's to protect treaty rights.

"This Movement was a peaceful protest involving nearly all of Indian Country. It was not the radical protest of a fringe group."

NCAI included its prior resolution which proclaimed “that in carrying out this resolution we remain in peace [as] . . . Indian Country’s first concern is for the safety of the peaceful protectors, law enforcement officers, government officials, and workers in Cannon Ball, ND, and any act of violence is unwelcome.”

NCAI said that a joint statement on the Movement from the Department of Justice, the Department of the Army, and the Department of the Interior read: “In recent days, we have seen thousands of demonstrators come together peacefully, with support from scores of sovereign tribal governments, to exercise their First Amendment rights and to voice heartfelt concerns about the environment and historic, sacred sites.”

NCAI stated that it respectfully submits this amicus brief in support of Vanessa Dundon, Crystal Wilson, David Demo, Guy Dullknife, III, Mariah Marie Bruce, and Frank Finan (collectively, “Plaintiffs-Appellants”), and the thousands of other Americans who stood in prayer and objected to the Army Corps’s complete abdication of its treaty and trust duties and responsibilities to protect and preserve the drinking water, sacred sites, and graves of Tribal Nations.

NCAI listed authorities in its brief, including the testimony before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in Jamaica in 2019, presented by Seanna Howard, Michelle Cook, Carl Williams and Rachel Lederman: Criminalization of Human Rights Defenders of  Indigenous Peoples Resisting Extractive Industries in the United States, June 24, 2019.

The authorities in NCAI's brief include:

Alleen Brown, Medics Describe How Police Sprayed Standing Rock  Demonstrators with Tear Gas and Water Cannons, THE INTERCEPT (Nov. 21,  2016, 5:52 PM)

Catherine Thorbecke, Officials Defend Use of Alleged ‘Dog Kennel’ Cells in  Dakota Access Pipeline Protest, ABC NEWS (Oct. 31, 2016, 6:32 PM)

Resolution #PHX-16-023, Support for the Standing Rock Sioux to Protect its  Lands, Waters, and Sacred Places, NCAI (Oct. 2016) 

NCAI Resolution Standing Rock


Vanessa Dundon, et al, versus Morton County Sheriff Kyle Kirchmeier, et al lawsuit can be viewed at:

Excerpt from the Dundon lawsuit:



Copyright Brenda Norrell, Censored News.

U.S. Policy Results in 10,250 Kidnappings of Migrants. Invasive Virtual Border Wall Led to More Abuse by Border Patrol.


A shrine, made of objects found on migrant trails, honors the lives of those who have died in the desert, at the No More Deaths camp in Arivaca, Ariz. - Photo: Matt Nager/Redux




By No More Deaths
Posted at Censored News
Sigue en español abajo


TUCSON -- Title 42: President Biden has declared his intention to end Title 42 on May 23, 2022. Title 42 is a harmful and racist policy invoked by the Trump administration which has prevented migrants and asylum-seekers from entering the U.S. for the last two years. However, plans to end Title 42 are being held up in court. At least 1.2 million of Title 42 expulsions have happened since Joe Biden's inauguration.

Human Rights First has tracked 10,250 kidnappings and other attacks against people blocked from entering the U.S. and/or expelled to Mexico. A point that we have emphasized throughout each administration is that both Democrats and Republicans are guilty and complicit in an anti-immigrant system.

May 5, 2022

Frack Off Chaco! Coalition Delivers Nearly 80,000 Comments to Halt Destruction in Greater Chaco Region


Photo courtesy WildEarth Guardians



Coalition Delivers nearly 80,000 Comments to Bureau of Land Management at Rally To "Truly Honor Chaco"

Commenters demand more meaningful protections for Greater Chaco and greater involvement of impacted communities



Greater Chaco Coalition Statement
Censored News
French Translation by Christine Prat

Santa Fe, NM - Today, the Greater Chaco Coalition/Frack Off Chaco, composed of environmental justice advocates, Indigenous grassroots organizations, tribal community leaders, and members of the public, rallied and delivered nearly 80,000 comments to the Bureau of Land Management demanding greater protections for the Greater Chaco Landscape and surrounding communities from expanded oil and gas activities.

Photo courtesy WildEarth Guardians

Today's rally coincided with the deadline to submit comments on the Bureau of Land Management's proposal to stop new oil and gas leasing for a 20-year period on roughly 350,000 acres of land within a 10-mile radius of Chaco Culture National Historical Park. More than 20 people attended the rally and participants contributed their name and comments to an artistic display of what it means to truly 'Honor Greater Chaco'.