Indigenous Peoples and Human Rights
Showing posts with label Appeals Court. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Appeals Court. Show all posts

September 18, 2023

Standing Rock -- Appeals Court to Hear Excessive Force Lawsuit at Backwater Bridge Tuesday






Standing Rock -- Appeals Court to Hear Excessive Force Lawsuit at Backwater Bridge Tuesday

Update: Federal appeals court hears excessive force, class action lawsuit, for injured at Backwater Bridge at Standing Rock

https://bsnorrell.blogspot.com/2023/09/federal-appeals-court-heard-arguments.html

By Brenda Norrell, Censored News, Sept. 19, 2023

Three hundred water protectors were injured on the night of November 20, 2016, at Backwater Bridge at Standing Rock. Twenty-six were seriously injured and taken by ambulance to nearby hospitals. Guy Dull Knife III was one of them. On Tuesday, an excessive force lawsuit filed against Morton County Sheriff Kyle Kirchmeier and others will be argued before the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis.

"On the night of November 20-21, 2016, law enforcement shot unarmed, nonviolent water protectors with impact munitions, flash-bang explosives, and freezing blasts of water over the course of ten hours, seriously injuring Appellants and many others," states the federal class-action, civil rights lawsuit Dundon v Kirchmeier.

Wašté Win Young, Water Protector and former Tribal Historic Preservation Officer for Standing Rock, reflected on the significance of the case.

“I was born and raised on Standing Rock. It’s my home. The law enforcement that attacked us were our neighbors. It was surreal. Even now, when I cross that bridge I remember the people who got maimed, fell through ice, sprayed with water and chemicals, injured by those who are supposed to protect us. There are several images imprinted in my mind from November 20, 2016."

"I remember law enforcement indiscriminately aiming water canons at a group of Native American individuals who were praying on their knees, while other law enforcement personnel shot tear gas and projectiles into the crowd where I was standing."

"I nearly choked on the tear gas. It is my hope that the rule of law will prevail against the law enforcement who blatantly disregarded the constitutional and civil rights of hundreds of peaceful protestors," Waste Win Young said.





Photo by Rob Wilson

May 6, 2022

NCAI Files Amicus Brief in Support of Critically Injured Water Protectors at Standing Rock




Standing Rock Water Protectors Attacked by Law Enforcement. Photo copyright Ryan Vizzions.

The National Congress of American Indians filed a friends of the court brief in federal appeals court, upholding Treaty rights, and the right of free speech, in support of critically injured Water Protectors at Standing Rock.

By Brenda Norrell
Censored News


The National Congress of American Indians filed an amicus brief in federal appeals court in support of Standing Rock Water Protectors who were seriously injured by militarized law enforcement while defending the water from Dakota Access Pipeline.

Upholding Water Protectors' Treaty rights, and right to free speech, NCAI described how the peaceful and prayerful movement was met by serious, life-threatening force by law enforcement, resulting in critical injuries.

NCAI urged the appeals court to uphold Native American rights and said this excessive force should not be allowed to silence Native people exercising their rights.

"If the excessive force used to silence Plaintiffs-Appellants’ protected speech stands, the ability of all NCAI member Tribal Nations to peacefully exercise their First Amendment rights -- without risking injury from life threatening, excessive police force -- will be greatly undermined."

"NCAI therefore has a unique interest in advocating for the affirmance of the constitutional rights of Plaintiffs-Appellants to peacefully speak in support of tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, and the protection of Native American sacred sites and burials.'"

The amicus brief, known as a friend of the court brief, was filed in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, in the case of Vanessa Dundon, et al, versus Morton County Sheriff Kyle Kirchmeier, et all, on April 29, 2022.

NCAI said, "The Native youth at Standing Rock who began the Movement are familiar with the history of violence inflicted on their people, but they began the Movement with hope by taking a peaceful, prayerful 'stand to be the voice for [their] community, for [their] great grandparents, and for Mother Earth.'"

"These Native youth inspired Plaintiffs-Appellants, and thousands of others (Native and non Native) who decided to join them in Cannon Ball, just one mile north of the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation. For six months, they engaged in a peaceful, prayerful protest — all the while demanding that the United States, specifically the Army Corps, uphold the treaty rights of the SRST and refuse to allow a private company, Dakota Access, LLC ('Dakota Access'), to build its pipeline."

Standing Rock 2016. Copyright Ryan Vizzions.


"Appellants and thousands of other peaceful protestors advocated for the SRST’s treaty rights in a clear exercise of their First Amendment rights. In response to this peaceful protest, law enforcement used force."

"The question, of course, is whether that use of force was excessive and whether it violated the rights of Plaintiffs-Appellants.

"It is undisputed that Plaintiffs-Appellees suffered serious bodily harm and injury. Their exercise of their First Amendment rights was, in fact, met with serious force and, in some cases, life-threatening force."

"If the excessive force used to silence Plaintiffs-Appellants’ protected speech stands, the ability of all NCAI member Tribal Nations to peacefully exercise their First Amendment rights—without risking injury from life threatening, excessive police force—will be greatly undermined."

"NCAI therefore has a unique interest in advocating for the affirmance of the constitutional rights of Plaintiffs-Appellants to peacefully speak in support of tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, and the protection of Native American sacred sites and burials.'

'For the following reasons, NCAI respectfully requests that this Court reverse the District Court’s granting of Defendants-Appellees’ Motion for Summary Judgment below."

NCAI told the Appeals Court that the Movement had broad support from Indian Country. In all, 356 separate Tribal Nations sent their flags to fly at the site where the peaceful protestors camped, and nearly 300 Tribal Nations passed resolutions or wrote letters of support for Standing Rock's to protect treaty rights.

"This Movement was a peaceful protest involving nearly all of Indian Country. It was not the radical protest of a fringe group."

NCAI included its prior resolution which proclaimed “that in carrying out this resolution we remain in peace [as] . . . Indian Country’s first concern is for the safety of the peaceful protectors, law enforcement officers, government officials, and workers in Cannon Ball, ND, and any act of violence is unwelcome.”

NCAI said that a joint statement on the Movement from the Department of Justice, the Department of the Army, and the Department of the Interior read: “In recent days, we have seen thousands of demonstrators come together peacefully, with support from scores of sovereign tribal governments, to exercise their First Amendment rights and to voice heartfelt concerns about the environment and historic, sacred sites.”

NCAI stated that it respectfully submits this amicus brief in support of Vanessa Dundon, Crystal Wilson, David Demo, Guy Dullknife, III, Mariah Marie Bruce, and Frank Finan (collectively, “Plaintiffs-Appellants”), and the thousands of other Americans who stood in prayer and objected to the Army Corps’s complete abdication of its treaty and trust duties and responsibilities to protect and preserve the drinking water, sacred sites, and graves of Tribal Nations.

NCAI listed authorities in its brief, including the testimony before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in Jamaica in 2019, presented by Seanna Howard, Michelle Cook, Carl Williams and Rachel Lederman: Criminalization of Human Rights Defenders of  Indigenous Peoples Resisting Extractive Industries in the United States, June 24, 2019.

The authorities in NCAI's brief include:

Alleen Brown, Medics Describe How Police Sprayed Standing Rock  Demonstrators with Tear Gas and Water Cannons, THE INTERCEPT (Nov. 21,  2016, 5:52 PM)

Catherine Thorbecke, Officials Defend Use of Alleged ‘Dog Kennel’ Cells in  Dakota Access Pipeline Protest, ABC NEWS (Oct. 31, 2016, 6:32 PM)

Resolution #PHX-16-023, Support for the Standing Rock Sioux to Protect its  Lands, Waters, and Sacred Places, NCAI (Oct. 2016) 

NCAI Resolution Standing Rock


Vanessa Dundon, et al, versus Morton County Sheriff Kyle Kirchmeier, et al lawsuit can be viewed at:

Excerpt from the Dundon lawsuit:



Copyright Brenda Norrell, Censored News.

July 3, 2019

Appeals Court Blocks Trump's Border Wall in Arizona and New Mexico in National Emergency Challenge


Our friend the Sonoran Pronghorn on the
Arizona Border, whose migration route is now targeted by Trump's Border Wall.
The real national emergency is that the homeland of Indigenous People and wildlife is threatened by a xenophobic president. -- Censored News
July 3, 2019

CONTACT: Virginia Cramer
virginia.cramer@sierraclub.org
CourtneyBourgoin
courtney.bourgoin@sierraclub.org

Appeals Court Blocks Trump’s Border Wall in National Emergency Challenge

The Appeals Court decision includes halting Trump's priority plan for a border wall at Organ Pipe National Monument, near the western side of the Tohono Oodham Nation, on the Arizona border

SAN FRANCISCO — A federal appeals court today denied the government’s attempt to begin construction of President Trump’s border wall using funds unauthorized by Congress. The ruling upholds an earlier district court order that blocks the administration from building wall sections along the southern border in New Mexico and Arizona using illegally diverted military funds.

May 26, 2017

Water Protectors in Appeals Court: Militarized Police, Water Hoses, Dangerous Munitions



Water Protectors Case in Appeals Court: Militarized Police, Water Hoses, Dangerous Munitions
Water Protectors File Arguments in the 8th Circuit on Militarized Policing
By Water Protector Legal Collective
Censored News
Dundon et al. v. Kirchmeier, 8th Circuit Case No 17-1306
Water Protector Legal Collective attorneys filed legal arguments today asking the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn a North Dakota federal district court ruling upholding local law enforcement agencies’ indiscriminate use of high pressure fire hoses and dangerous munitions on protesters. The plaintiffs want the appeals court to order the lower court to grant an injunction prohibiting law enforcement from shooting indiscriminately into crowds of protesters, or at minimum, order the lower court to hold a hearing to hear directly from witnesses for both sides on the water protectors’ request for a preliminary injunction.
On Nov. 20, 2016, lead plaintiff Vanessa Dundon was severely injured and partially blinded when she was hit in the face with a teargas canister. 300 people were treated for injuries ranging from hypothermia to fractures to partial loss of a limb when the Morton County Sheriff turned fire hoses, impact munitions and explosive grenades on water protectors who were protesting and praying on a bridge near the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) construction site and within the boundaries of Oceti Sakowin (Seven Council Fires, or Great Sioux Nation) treaty lands. Ms. Dundon, who is a Navajo Nation member, and eight other named plaintiffs are suing Morton County Sheriff Kyle Kirchmeier and other officials in a civil rights class action which seeks both injunctive relief and compensation for the injured.
“Judge Hovland denied the preliminary injunction motion without a hearing, even though he acknowledged that there were major factual disputes between the two sides,” said WPLC cooperating attorney Rachel Lederman, lead counsel for the Dundon plaintiffs. “The judge accepted law enforcement’s tale of being overrun by violent rioters even though we filed 50 sworn declarations telling a very different story. The vast majority of the water protectors were simply praying, singing, chanting, taking photos, or trying to aid the injured when they were drenched with freezing water, gassed and shot at for hours. We can’t allow this to continue when all over the country, indigenous peoples and their allies are taking a stand against fossil fuel pipelines and the desecration of native land and the environment.”
One of the declarations submitted by plaintiffs was by former Baltimore Police Commissioner Thomas Frazier, who opined:
“The use by law enforcement of shotgun fired bean bag rounds, as seen in video supplied to me by the plaintiffs, is excessive. These are highly dangerous weapons which should never be used indiscriminately in a crowd, yet that is exactly what I saw based on the video evidence. It is inappropriate and excessive force to shoot bean bag rounds, or to launch direct impact sponge rounds, into a crowd for the purpose of crowd dispersal…
“The brute force of the impact of the water jet is a force option that would not be considered appropriate by most modern police chiefs or sheriffs, or tolerated by their citizenry. In this case, the use of this device in sub-freezing temperatures, in my opinion, serves no reasonable purpose and can only be considered a retaliatory and punitive action.”
Commissioner Frazier went on to explain: “Law enforcement’s unnecessary use of these [munitions] and the resulting serious injuries from their use are important reasons which justify the Plaintiffs’ request that this Court prohibit the reckless use of the these weapons. If the victims of these weapons had violated the law, there were enough law enforcement officers present to arrest them. Therefore, there exists no reasonable justification for their use.”
Defendants Morton County Sheriff Kyle Kirchmeier and other law enforcement defendants can be expected to file a response in the 8th Circuit in about a month. The plaintiffs expect amicus (friend of the court) briefs to be filed by the ACLU and Amnesty International supporting their arguments.
Water Protector Legal Collective Contact:
Rachel Lederman, WPLC Attorney: rlederman@beachledermanlaw.com, 415-350-6496
Brandy Toelupe, WPLC Attorney: btoelupe@tildentoelupe.com, 720-876-8300
Jessica Beheler, WPLC PR and Media Coordinator: pr@wplegal.org, 701-595-1509
Links:
If you are a Water Protector and need legal assistance, please call the WPLC Hotline at (701) 566-9108.
If you need travel assistance returning to North Dakota, contact the Freshet Collective at (605) 519-8180.
The Water Protector Legal Collective (WPLC) provides on-the-ground legal representation and coordination for Water Protectors engaged in resistance to the Dakota Access Pipeline at Standing Rock, ND in partnership with the National Lawyers Guild (NLG). To support the work of WPLC, please visit https://fundrazr.com/RedOwlLegal
www.waterprotectorlegal.org

Ohio State Trooper Sniper on a Hill
Sniper during peaceful protest by unarmed water protectors at Standing Rock.
Photo obtained by FOIA by MuckRock.
Photo posted by Censored News.