Indigenous Peoples and Human Rights

March 6, 2022

Yucca Mountain Nuclear Dump on Shoshone Land: U.S. Racism and Genocide


Photo by Gregor Gable

This is a response to the Department of Energy Request for Additional Information on consent-based siting of nuclear waste facilities. My comments are provided as Secretary of the Native Community Action Council and as an appointee in 2017 to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Licensing Support Network Advisory Review Panel. The Native Community Action Council is a party with standing in Yucca Mountain Licensing as a deep geologic repository with the only contention of ownership of Yucca Mountain in NRC Docket 63-001. The Native Community Action Council has provided input in 2015 and 2017 and believes the current approach by DOE is fatally flawed and should immediately stop. 

Ian Zabarte, Secretary
Native Community Action Council
Censored News
March 6, 2022

Area 1: Consent-Based Siting Process

1. How should the Department build considerations of social equity and environmental justice into a consent-based siting process?

Consultation is not consent but when done, should be according to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People with free, prior informed consent of Indigenous people affected--a right of self-determination, and in the planning and implementation of projects on our lands defined by treaty, or other constructive agreements with states. The law needs to be enforced and resources directed to indigenous communities for clean-up efforts and proper enforcement.  

The siting process for an interim storage facility has already failed the Shoshone people by NRC licensing an interim storage facility in Texas-based upon the final licensing of Yucca Mountain on Shoshone property. Yucca Mountain is illegal and will not be licensed in spite of abuse by coordinate agencies of the US government supporting the nuclear industrial complex. The Yucca Mountain is unconstitutional under the terms of peace and friendship because shipping nuclear waste then storing nuclear waste on Shoshone property without Shoshone consent is racism. Congress by proposing Shoshone property under the Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1987 in violation of the Treaty of Ruby Valley is legislative malfeasance and Congressional malpractice by designating Yucca Mountain as the sole site for investigation and licensing as a deep geological repository. 

2. What role should Tribal, State, and local governments and officials play in determining consent for a community to host a federal interim storage facility?

The role of victim has already been selected for the Western Shoshone at Yucca Mountain by the DOE and coordinate agencies failing to follow the law, the US Constitution Article 6, treaty supremacy clause, and the Treaty of Ruby Valley (18 Statute 689-692. The intent of the DOE and coordinate agencies is to inflict conditions intended to bring about the destruction of the Shoshone people in whole or in part, a peremptory norm in International Law and a violation of 18 USC 1091 GENOCIDE. DOE and coordinate agencies must address the facts of law that the Treaty of Ruby Valley is in full force and effect and thereby controlling the siting of Yucca Mountain as illegal. The NRC must come into line with that fact of treaty laws of the US in the licensing of any interim storage facility for nuclear waste. 


  3. What benefits or opportunities could encourage local, State, and Tribal governments to consider engaging with the Department as it works to identify federal interim storage sites?


Acknowledging the facts of law in the US Constitution Article 6 treaty supremacy and the Treaty of Ruby Valley (18 Statute 689) and the President establishing a safe place for the protection, growth, and development of the Western Bands of the Shoshone Nation of Indians under article 6 of the treaty. The State of Nevada and Nye County have been engaged in defrauding the Shoshone people of our rights, title and interests that should accrue to the benefit of the Western Bands of the Shoshone Nation of Indians. Federal funds from grants and payments equal to taxes provided by federal law to Nevada for federal projects on Shoshone treaty property are distributed to all units of local government except Indians. That is environmental racism, discrimination, and fraud under 18 USC ss 1961-68 RICO.


  Area 2: Removing Barriers to Meaningful Participation  


  Acknowledging the facts of law in the US Constitution Article 6 treaty supremacy and the Treaty of Ruby Valley (18 Statute 689) and the President establishing a safe place for the protection, growth and development of the Western Bands of the Shoshone Nation of Indians under article 6 of the treaty. The State of Nevada and Nye County have been engaged in defrauding the Shoshone people of our rights, title, and interests that should accrue to the benefit of the Western Bands of the Shoshone Nation of Indians. Federal funds from grants and payments equal to taxes provided by federal law to Nevada for federal projects on Shoshone treaty property are distributed to all units of local government except Indians. That is environmental racism, discrimination and fraud under 18 USC ss 1961-68 RICO.


  Area 3: Interim Storage as Part of a Waste Management System   

The siting process for an interim storage facility has already failed the Shoshone people by NRC licensing an interim storage facility in Texas based upon the final licensing of Yucca Mountain on Shoshone property. Yucca Mountain is illegal and will not be licensed in spite of abuse by coordinated agencies of the US government supporting the nuclear industrial complex. Yucca Mountain is unconstitutional under the terms of peace and friendship because shipping nuclear waste then storing nuclear waste on Shoshone property without Shoshone consent is racism. Congress by proposing Shoshone property in violation of the Treaty of Ruby Valley is legislative malfeasance and Congressional malpractice by designating Yucca Mountain as the sole site for investigation and licensing as a deep geological repository. 

4. What are barriers or impediments to the successful siting of federal interim storage facilities using a consent-based process and how could they be addressed?

Failure to protect and defend the US Constitution and treaties made pursuant to the Constitution including Indian treaties then interfering with the rights of the Shoshone people to free enjoyment of our property defined by the Treaty of Ruby Valley (Consolidated Treaty Series Volume 127 1863.

5. How should the Department work with local communities to establish reasonable expectations and plans concerning the duration of storage at federal interim storage facilities?

First implement health surveys for baseline studies, registration, surveillance, and monitoring of individuals. Origin is important so health care must include indigenous people. 

6. What organizations or communities should the Department consider partnering with to develop a consent-based approach to siting? 

Contact the Secretary of the Interior to stop the abuse of the Shoshone Nation, create the treaty reservation to correct the past abuse by the Department of Energy and prevent future abuse. Since the Secretary of the Interior claims superintendence of Indians according to the US Supreme Court's Marshall trilogy, Johnson v. MacKintosh, Worcester v. Georgia and US v. Cherokee Nation--Indians cannot consent and it is the US that is wholly responsible for the outcomes of the DOE policy or licensing by coordinate agencies of Yucca Mountain and Texas or any other site considered as an interim storage facility predicated upon illegally licensing  Shoshone treaty property as in Yucca Mountain NRC Docket 63-001.

7. What other issues, including those raised in the Draft Consent-Based Siting Process ( www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2017/01/f34/Draft Consent-Based Siting Process and Siting Considerations.pdf ), should the Department consider in implementing a consent-based siting process?

The DOE should consider the seriousness of acts violating the basic human rights of the Shoshone people including genocide for which there is no statute of limitation under 18 USC 1091, 2340, 2340A, 2441, and 2442 inclusive and end the consent-based siting process under penalty of law.

Sincerely,
 
Ian Zabarte, Secretary
Native Community Action Council

No comments: