Navajo Grassroots Overwhelmingly Oppose Water Settlement
Council will soon make a decision on the Navajo-Hopi Little Colorado River Water Rights Settlement Agreement
|Photo Paper Rocket Productions|
Marshall Johnson, To Nizhoni Ani
Posted at Censored News
June 13, 2012
WINDOW ROCK, Ariz. – Since the Navajo-Hopi Little Colorado River Water Rights Settlement Act and Agreement were first proposed in February, opponents and proponents of the settlement have been engaged in a David and Goliath-like battle over the waters of the Navajo Nation. Opponents of the bill include a movement of various grassroots Navajo organizations and individuals, collectively calling themselves the Dine Water Rights Committee. Proponents of the bill include Arizona Senator Jon Kyl, and the Navajo Nation tribal government’s Executive and Judicial branches led by President Ben Shelly and Attorney General Harrison Tsosie. The final decision lies with the Navajo Nation Legislative Branch's 24 Tribal Council Delegates who will be voting within the next week and potentially as early as this Friday.
“It’s obvious that the grassroots people of the Navajo Nation reject the settlement agreement,” states Jihan Gearon, Executive Director of the Black Mesa Water Coalition. “We have collected hundreds of petition signatures from concerned citizens opposed to the settlement as well as hundreds of letters against the settlement. Furthermore, there wasoverwhelming opposition at each of the eight educational forums organized by the grassroots organizations, not to mention the overwhelming opposition voiced against the settlement at each of the seven town hall meetings sponsored by the President’s office under direction from the council.”
Opposition is further evidenced by the growing number of chapter resolutions that have been passed opposing the settlement. Both the Navajo Nation Water Rights Commission and the Dine Water Rights Committee have beenconsistently invited to educate and debate during various chapter meetings. So far the following Navajo Nation Chapters: Copper Mine, Coalmine, Fort Defiance,Sawmill, Red Lake, Crystal, Gap-Bodaway, Leupp, Dilkon, Rock Springs, Manuelito,Red Rock, Lupton, and Indian Wells as well as the Chinle Agency Council have all voted against the settlement agreement. And the number is growing.
Other opponents of the bill include the DilkonVeterans Group, the Farm Board, the Navajo Nation Human Rights Commission, and formerNavajo Nation Presidents Peter McDonald, Milton Bluehouse, and Leonard Haskie. Ina united front to oppose this injustice, former Hopi Chairmen and Hopi grassroots organizations have also aligned with the Dine Water Rights Committee to oppose the settlement. Youth too, have decisively weighed in on the issue. “Half of the Navajo Nation are between the ages of 18 and 24 which means that thecentral government needs to listen to the youth”, states Sarana Riggs of Next Indigenous Generation. “Our vision for the future includes a just transition away from the coal-based economy, a diverse and sustainable economy based on traditional values, and true self sufficiency for the Navajo Nation. We will sign these things away if we agree to the settlement.”
"We are for a settlement agreement that honors our historical roots that predate American laws and allow for true input from the Navajo people”, affirms Marshall Johnson, Lead Organizer with To Nizhoni Ani. “This settlement is being fast tracked to satisfy Kyl and McCains’ efforts to continue the legacy of free and cheap electricity and water delivery to central and southern Arizona. It’s not about providing much needed services to the Navajo people as they claim. This should really be called the ‘Keep Navajo Generating Station Open Settlement Agreement.'"
The Navajo Nation Council itself has questioned the settlement since Kyl first announced it in February. “We understand that theCouncil is under a lot of pressure from DC to sign this agreement and we are very proud of them for not being bullied into it," says Don Yellowman, President of the Forgotten People Corporation. “But I think that if the Council votes in favor of the settlement, they would be going against their own people. And I don’t think that would be something the people would soon forget.”
The Dine Water Rights Committee includes Forgotten People Corporation, Black Mesa Water Coalition, To Nizhoni Ani, Dine Citizens Against Ruining the Environment, Hada'asidi, Next Indigenous Generation, Council Advocating an Indigenous Manifesto, and many Navajo individuals. For more information, please visit: http://www.facebook.com/waterrights.
Online version available at: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B1pO4QoxBKYaVjZUNk1hZWdlQUE/edit?pli=1
Water infrastructure for ALL Nations'
water needs is the responsibility of the United States; isn't it? Why is water infrastructure predicated on any abrogation at all of any water rights?
Comment above was regarding statement "I have seen throughout our Nation a severe need for water infrastructure.
The settlement offers our Nation an opportunity to build and secure water rights for our current needs and our future growth." (This is bullshit!)
Post a Comment