Indigenous Peoples and Human Rights

January 2, 2011

Navajo filmmaker Arlene Bowman: Reflections, Amiens, France

By Arlene Bowman, Dine' filmmaker
Censored News

Photos copyright Arlene Bowman (Photo one: Mirror self portrait. Photo 2 Group photo (L) Chad Burris' partner, producer & Chad Burris, Reaghan Tarbell, someone who is organizing a film festival, Bennie Klain, Leighton C Peterson. Bottom row seated: Carlos Pienado, Sam.
FESTIVAL INTERNATIONAL DU FILM D'AMIENS at Amiens, France happened from November 12-21, 2010 where I and other Indigenous filmmakers showed our film-video works. I had not traveled outside of North America since 2000 and I am a traveler type.

I was unable to view some of the films and videos that screened although I wanted to such as: "In the Footsteps of Yellow Woman, "Paatwaqatsi: Water, Land and Life," "Wapikon Mobile" and "Shimasani," but was able to view: "A Thousand Roads," Four Sheets to the Wind, Good Night Irene," "The Cave," "Conversion," "Little Caughnawaga: To Brooklyn and Back," "The Return of Navajo Boy," "WaterBuster," "Weaving Worlds" and "Kissing by Lightning," which I enjoyed a lot. Also, I showed "The Graffiti," the experimental drama I made. The program I was in were all dramas, thirty minutes or less. We all had two screenings. I missed the first screening on November 12th because I had not arrived. The repeat took place on November 18th. Most of the producers and filmmakers showed up such as Chad Burris, producer for Sterling Harjo, Bennie Klain and Leighton C. Peterson for "Weaving Worlds," Carlos Peinado for "WaterBuster," Shelley Niro for" Kissing by Lightning," Reaghan Tarbell for "Little Caughnawaga: To Brooklyn and Back" and myself, Arlene Bowman. We screened and afterwards answered the question/answer. The program was a retrospective of Indigenous films and videos mostly made by Indigenous filmmakers from North America.

Jean Pierre Garcia is the director of Festival International du Film d' Amiens, www.filmfestamiens.org and Gilles Lapre'prevotte helped to program it. Through the 2010 Amiens film festival, Gilles Lapre'prevotte and Thierry Roche wrote a book called "Indian's Song,"a description about Indigenous films/videos from the past to the present.

The Festival International du d' Film d' Amiens previously has held Indigenous film-video retrospectives with the Indigenous filmmakers present. As an independent Dine' filmmaker, my point-of-view is that the French and German nations of all the European nations have been the most active to promote, are attracted and motivated enough to invite Indigenous filmmakers to speak and present their films-videos at their festivals. I have attended previous Festival International du Film d' Amiens in the 90's, but since July 1997 I had not been invited to any film festival. 00 I attended a gathering in New Zealand where Maori and other Indigenous women filmmakers presented-screened their works, but it was not a film festival. That event was the last time I saw Merita Mita, a Maori filmmaker, one of few Indigenous women who has made a dramatic feature. She died in 2010. Also, I have not made film or video projects continuously since 1994-04 like other filmmakers which is a goal for most filmmakers, but hard to do, although I wished I could have. Great gaps in in between film-video projects in my life. It is and has been difficult to financially survive as a filmmaker. Other filmmakers are way luckier, especially the male Indigenous filmmakers. As you know the filmmaker raises the money and then makes the project. It has taken me twenty-six years to be able to learn how to write a successful film or video proposal with a budget to obtain funding. My proposals have been rejected many times. However, this proves that a person who does not write film-video proposals very well can greatly improve. Practice makes perfect and not to give up, but at times I felt like giving up. Also, I like to get to know other Indigenous and non-Indigenous filmmakers, but sometimes there are barriers created to keep the distance, which I do not understand. Could it be competition among all the Indigenous filmmakers? Or is a hierarchy present? In 1997 I showed the "Navajo Talking Picture," the first film I made at Prades Festival of Films, the Cine-Recontres at Prades, France in July 1997. There I met Christi a French woman who helped to organize the front desk at the film festival. She travelled by train four hours to the north from the south to attend and view "The Graffiti." I had not seen or talked to her in person since August 1997. She is the only French person from France I really know a lot. I do not know many French people other than her. I was told people at Amiens remembered me when my hair was long to my waist. Now my hair is short.

It was fun to meet other Indigenous filmmakers and producers I had heard about such as Chad Burris with his partner, Shelley Niro and to meet the new ones such as Bennie Klain, Leighton C. Peterson and Carlos Peinado. In Amiens I did things by myself and with the new friends such as to attend film-video screenings. Also, sometimes we all ate together at restaurants during the week. We did some sight seeing of Amiens together such as to visit the floating gardens.

About the Indigenous films and videos: the dramas and documentaries I viewed, I liked them all. More and more Indigenous people make dramas such as "The Cave" by Helen Haig-Brown, but the documentary filmmaking will continue on such as with Weaving Worlds by Bennie Klain and Leighton C. Peterson. Especially I liked Shelley Niro's Kissing by Lightning because it was a dramatic film, which featured a female Indigenous lead actor, Kateri Walker. Shelley Niro expressed to me and to the public, I made this film because there are not many film dramas which feature an Indigenous female lead character. I expressed to her, that is the exact reason why I made the Graffiti, too.

From the film festival, the people I became better acquainted with were the translators who translated English to French: Susan Christophe, Andrew Christophe-Brown and Eleonore. Susan Christophe was Andrew's mother. She translated at previous film festivals. Curious bunch. I do not speak French. When I needed translation even anything not related to the festival such as when I lost my eye glasses: for example, Elenore helped out and she did not mind to help. Elenore spoke to the young woman at the cafe and she asked if she had seen some eye glasses on the table or on the floor, the day I lost them. They eventually showed up before I left. Whew!

In Amiens I walked around on my own because I like to be alone and walk about. If I could have, I would have bought a bike in Amiens and biked around more because I like to bike and it is how I get around in Vancouver and Surrey BC. I walked up street boulevards in Amiens. On one street I noticed a lot of young people hung out. Youth were not white, French. Those French youth had black hair, dark skin and dressed in the hip hop style of North America. They looked like they stemmed from India, Pakistan and Turkey. Another time, I visited the cathedral in the middle of town in the fog. I was informed about a pitch session of screenplays happening in Amiens if I wished to attend it, but I was unable to. Now I now wished I could have, but I could only do so much in the days presented. Also, I like to look at clothes. Andrew Christophe-Brown showed me some places to go to. I could not afford to buy the clothes, but to look at what is out there is okay. There seems to be more variety of shoes in France than in the U.S. and Canada, which I liked a lot. It seems that most French people dress up in the latest style from the very young to older; for example, a lot of women wore calf length or knee high boots. Definitely France is different in this way than the U.S and Canada because North Americans do not constantly really dress up. I think North Americans dress down more. North Americans who have money dress up more; yet, at the same time, I have been to parties in the U.S. and noticed people who have money, they dress down as well. In the U.S. it is a mixture of dress up and down which I like.

Besides the dependence to speak French to get by on, the French peoples' esthetics differs from North America. This point-of-view shows up in the way their cafes and buildings looks. French use bright colors and lights to design their buildings. Hate to say it, but when I returned back to North America to Seattle International Airport, their airport looked drab compared to Charles-de-Gaulle airport. Possibly this links up with the fashion scene I viewed.

On my way back I stayed two days in Paris and did more sight seeing of places not seen before such as still photo shows. Lots to do in two days. Viewed lots of graffiti painted upon walls in Amiens and Paris, which most likely happens world wide. When I first came to France during November 1986, I disliked French people and France. I hated Paris. In my travel experiences the Espanol people from South America, Centro America and Mexico were far more friendlier than the French to meet as strangers. The experience to show the "Navajo Talking Picture" in Southern France in July 1997 and with the French people I met, totally changed my prejudice 360 degrees. The terrain mattered. Combined the weather was like Los Angeles and Arizona: drier. I expressed this to Christi. Maybe it was better not to like Paris in the beginning. This last time when I visited Paris and France in November 2010, I said to Christi, Paris is a city made for the artist such as the filmmaker, painter, dancer, still photographer, the writer, fashion designer and other types of artists. I took lots of pictures of Amiens and Paris. I wish I had a small digital video camera, but I did not have one. I hope that with the filmmakers I met at Amiens we can continue to assist each other and keep up the contact. To attend and screen "The Graffiti" at the Festival International du Film d' Amiens was a highlight, one among few artistic highlights to happen in 2010, but I am grateful. Thank you. http://visualeye.wordpress.com/

December 31, 2010

Censored in 2010: Defense of Mother Earth, the racist right, US torture and collapse of the media



Censored in 2010: Defense of Mother Earth, the racist right, US torture and collapse of the media
By Brenda Norrell/Censored News/http://www.bsnorrell.blogspot.com (Photo: Dine Water Rights/march 2010)
What was censored in 2010 on the issues of Indigenous Peoples and human rights? Due to the collapse of the media and the proliferation of the racist right, there's too much to print, but here are ten of the most censored issues.


1. The United States -- the last country in the world to support the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples -- fooled many people when President Obama announced the US would support the Declaration. However, the US did not "endorse," "adopt," or "sign on" to the Declaration. The US only announced "support," and attached a lengthy list of limitations from the US State Dept.


2. None of the elected Native American leaders from the United States joined Bolivian President Evo Morales in his push for new global standards to protect Mother Earth at the climate summits in Cochabamba or Cancun. Carbon trading scams continued, allowing the worst global polluters to continue to pollute. Even though coal-fired power plants are a leading cause of global warming and destruction in the Arctic habitat of wildlife, the Navajo Nation continued to push for another coal fired power plant, Desert Rock. Other Indian Nations continued the push for oil and gas drilling and other polluting industries. The Navajo Nation gave away Dineh water rights in Arizona and uranium mining companies continued to target Navajo, Lakota and other Indian lands.


3. The proliferation of the racist right fueled anti-migrant hysteria in Arizona and elsewhere. Along the US Mexico border, profiteering from migrant prisons and border security contracts continued. The shooting deaths of American Indians by city and county police in Washington State, South Dakota, and elsewhere, along with the arrest in Virginia of a Mohawk film crew, exposed the malignant racism in US law enforcement. The white superiority mindset of the Ku Klux Klan continues in the US, both within white cloaks and police uniforms. It also continues in state legislatures, including Arizona, and in Indian bordertowns.


4. President Obama spent only about 30 minutes with the 12 Native American leaders invited to the White House, and only about 30 minutes with the 565 Native leaders invited to the Interior Building, during the White House Tribal Nations Conference in Dec. It was originally proclaimed as a welcome to the White House for all Indian leaders, last year. Again this year, the 565 Native leaders did not get that handshake and welcome to the White House.


5. The US State Dept. wasted a great deal of time and money of grassroots Native people by holding "Listening Conferences," on human rights issues in numerous locations in 2010. In the final US Periodic Review to the United Nations, almost all were ignored. Even the online State Dept. summaries were pathetic, lacking key names and issues.


6. The United States, George Bush and Dick Cheney, were not held responsible for US torture, in violation of the Geneva Conventions, in 201o. US drones continued to be used for rogue assassinations and the killing of civilians. The US continued the School of Americas, Guantanamo, secret black sites of torture and the training of military soldiers from other countries in torture.


7. The pathetic collapse of the news industry left the industry on life support. Many journalists became, or continued to be, armchair journalists. Some continued cheerleading for the US war in Afghanistan, urging young people toward death, for a bogus war, without examining the truth behind this war. Still others focused on divisive politics, or simply collapsed into the Internet, plagiarizing, rewriting press releases, and making a few phone calls.


8. While the US media pointed its clean white fingers at Mexico's drug war, few reporters pointed out that there would be no drug war in Mexico if it were not for the demand by US citizens for illegal drugs. Few reporters pointed out that the Zetas, the most notorious murderers in the cartels in Mexico, were originally trained as human killing machines of the US special forces.


9. US Border Patrol agents, immigration agents and the US military continue to smuggle drugs and weapons, and murder and rape, with impunity, along the US/Mexico border. The US Army Special Ops continues to post online its operating manual, showing that it provides weapons and support to guerrillas to destabilize governments, and continue war. Ultimately this means the US is responsible for killing its own citizens, along with other innocent women, children and elderly.
.

10: While global enforcement agencies focused on Wikileaks, rather than the perpetrators of the crimes, these agencies ignored the murdered and missing women and children in Canada, and the widespread global trafficking of women and children. Meanwhile, Wikileaks shed light on the white privilege mindset within the cables, as the US and its partner multi-national corporations continued to assassinate and make homeless Indigenous Peoples living on lands targeted for mining, dams and deforestation around the world.
Here are the most popular links on Indigenous Peoples and human rights from Censored News 2010:

This week: Wikileaks on Indigenous Peoples: US white privilege
http://bsnorrell.blogspot.com/2010/12/wikileaks-on-indigenous-peoples-us.html
Past six months:
Wikileaks: Canada's unauthorized wiretaps of Mohawks (5,448 views)
http://bsnorrell.blogspot.com/2010/08/wikileaks-canadas-unauthorized-wiretaps.html
Video: Virginia police attack Akwesasne film crew in 'Mississippi Burning' style attack
http://bsnorrell.blogspot.com/2010/11/video-virginia-police-attack-akwesasne.html
Tewa Women United at US Social Forum (Fighting the nuclear industry on sacred lands in northern New Mexico)
http://bsnorrell.blogspot.com/2010/06/video-tewa-women-united-at-us-social.html
Tohono O'odham Mike Wilson responds to threat of poisoned water at migrant water stations
http://bsnorrell.blogspot.com/2010/08/mike-wilson-tohono-oodham-responds-to.html
The Border: O'odham Ofelia Rivas to National Guard: 'We do not want you on our land'
http://bsnorrell.blogspot.com/2010/08/oodham-to-national-guard-we-do-not-want.html
Secret negotiations released on Navajo water rights settlement
http://bsnorrell.blogspot.com/2010/09/secret-negotiations-released-on-navajo.html
AIM video highlights: San Francisco conference 2010, recordings by Earthcycles http://bsnorrell.blogspot.com/2010/11/aim-conference-video-highlights-2010.html
Peltier family accuses US of medical neglect
http://censored-news.blogspot.com/2010/11/leonard-peltier-family-accuses-us-of.html
Top video by Earthcycles/Censored News 2010
Southern Border Indigenous Roundtable, hosted by the Indigenous Alliance without Borders
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/10935828

December 30, 2010

Modoc Nation: State Dept. contradicts Obama's statement of UN Declaration

December 30: Issaquah, Washington
Analysis and Commentary by Two Eagles (Perry Chesnut)
Secretary of State, Modoc Nation

State Department White Paper Contradicts Obama’s Statements at Tribal Nations Conference – Shows U.S. Endorsement of UNDRIP Really Means Politics and Business as Usual
By Modoc Nation, Sec. of State Two Eagles (Perry Chestnut)

On December 16, 2010, President Obama met with more than 300 tribal leaders at Blair House for the second White House Tribal Nations Conference. In his opening remarks (transcript issued by the White House Office of the Press Secretary), the President surprised almost everyone by announcing that the United States is changing the position it has held since September of 2007 concerning the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) – from a position of outright rejection to a position of “lending its support to this declaration.” The President’s announcement was met with tremendous applause. Camera flashes filled the room, and hundreds of participants captured the moment by video on their cell phones.

It is worthwhile to read the actual words the President spoke just following this announcement, worthwhile because they raised the hopes and aspirations of not only the conference participants but also all Native Americans who have heard or seen the media reports that the U.S. has changed its position and will now support UNDRIP. But sadly, as I shall point out below, the President’s promises and platitudes may turn out to be nothing more than just empty talk. First, the President’s words from the point at which he announced support for UNDRIP:

“And as you know, in April, we announced that we were reviewing our position on the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. And today I can announce that the United States is lending its support to this declaration. (Applause.)

The aspirations it affirms -- including the respect for the institutions and rich cultures of Native peoples -- are one we must always seek to fulfill. And we’re releasing a more detailed statement about U.S. support for the declaration and our ongoing work in Indian Country. But I want to be clear: What matters far more than words -- what matters far more than any resolution or declaration -– are actions to match those words. And that’s what this conference is about. (Applause.) That’s what this conference is about. That’s the standard I expect my administration to be held to.

So we’re making progress. We’re moving forward. And what I hope is that we are seeing a turning point in the relationship between our nations. The truth is, for a long time, Native Americans were implicitly told that they had a choice to make. By virtue of the longstanding failure to tackle wrenching problems in Indian Country, it seemed as though you had to either abandon your heritage or accept a lesser lot in life; that there was no way to be a successful part of America and a proud Native American.

But we know this is a false choice. To accept it is to believe that we can’t and won’t do better. And I don’t accept that. I know there is not a single person in this room who accepts that either. We know that, ultimately, this is not just a matter of legislation, not just a matter of policy. It’s a matter of whether we’re going to live up to our basic values. It’s a matter of upholding an ideal that has always defined who we are as Americans. E pluribus unum. Out of many, one.

That’s why we’re here. That’s what we’re called to do. And I’m confident that if we keep up our efforts, that if we continue to work together, that we will live up to the simple motto and we will achieve a brighter future for the First Americans and for all Americans.”

President Obama wants to be clear: “What matters far more than words . . . are actions to match those words,” and action is the standard to which he expects his administration to be held. He derides the “false choice” that previous administrations have given Native Americans - that “you either had to abandon your heritage or accept a lesser lot in life,” and he rejects outright the basis of that false choice – the belief “that we can’t and won’t do better.” In perhaps the finest words of all he said: “We know that, ultimately, this is not just a matter of legislation, not just a matter of policy. It’s a matter of whether we’re going to live up to our basic values. It’s a matter of upholding an ideal that has always defined who we are as Americans. E pluribus unum. Out of many, one.”

The problem with the motto “Out of many, one” is that it reminds indigenous peoples of the dark and unrelenting history of eradication that has been the policy (at times stated but mostly unstated) of the United States concerning the indigenous peoples who inhabited this land for millennia before there even was a United States. The motto reminds us of genocide, at first by slaughter and, continuing even today, by assimilation. Of course, the President did not have this in mind when he said it; he meant it in the most positive sense.

However, within hours of the President’s remarks, the U.S. State Department issued its 15-page white paper titled “Announcement of U.S. Support for the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples - Initiatives to Promote the Government-to-Government Relationship & Improve the Lives of Indigenous Peoples.” (see attached .pdf file if the following link does not work U.S. State Department’s statement about U.S. support for UNDRIP) This document, not the President’s fine words, reflect the real position of the United States on the extent to which it has changed its position on and is willing to support UNDRIP. And folks, it isn’t good. It is so cleverly written that one commentator (Rudolph Ryser, writing for the Fourth World Eye, a publication of the Center for World Indigenous Studies) referred to it as “verbal sleight of hand.”

Let’s take a look at how the U.S. State Department, indeed, the entire Executive Branch of government, intends to “support” UNDRIP by lip service alone.
Click for more:
http://censored-news.blogspot.com/2010/12/modoc-nation-us-state-dept-contradicts.html

Easter Island Police attack Rapanui women and children Dec. 29

BREAKING NEWS - PRESS RELEASE FROM RAPA NUI
December 29, 2010
Today, December 29th just before 7 PM, an contingency of 200 armed police began violently dislodging the Rapanui Parliament from their headquarters in the enter of the town of Hanga Roa, Rapa Nui. The police have beaten dozens of Rapa Nui with clubs, including children and women. They have arrested at least two dozen people.
This action was a unilateral decision made by the Regional Indendent, Raul Celis. The operation was directed by the Police Commander, Oscar Salazar who confirmed, "Celis gave the order."
Lola Tuki, who was there said that it was "unbelievable to see the degree of violence and inhuman treatment and prejudice. The police were
cursing at the women calling them, "Goddamn indian bitches", and grabbing them violently.
Many of the people taken from the Tuki and HIto clan were defending the President of the Rapa Nui Parliament, Leviante Araki.
This is a developing story.
CONTACT:
Lola Tuki 011 569 62144264
Santi Hitorangi 845 596 5402