June 9, 2007

DQ University struggles to survive

Native American Students at DQ University Struggle to Save Student Representation at their College
Students seek help, meet on June 10:

Deganawidah Quetzalcoatl University in Davis, CA is California's only tribal college. There has been an on-going struggle between DQU students and the DQU Board of Trustees since 2005 when the college lost its accreditation. Incompetence and negligence on the part of the former school administration cost the college its accreditation in January 2005. Following that, a group of DQU students, with community support, vowed to stay on campus and take charge of their own education, turning the campus into a healthy, self-sustaining and self-determined living environment. The students are now facing removal from campus by the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees denies that DQU has any students. On June 16, the Board will vote to refuse current students housing on campus. The students have been asking for representation on the Board because they are not currently getting input on decisions about the future of the university. The students are now seeking support and witnesses during the possible eviction process. The students have been the sole residents at DQU since January 2005. They are demanding the right to stay on campus with or without the Board's approval. The students are currently facing harrassment and intimidation by the Board's behavior.
Students and supporters are meeting at DQU on Sunday, June 10 at 10:00 AM to discuss and organize for community representation at the upcoming Board meeting on Saturday, June 16 at 10:00 AM. For further information, contact Chris Yazzie at (928) 225-1740.
Photo Brenda Norrell: Protecting the gate at DQ

Indigenous Alliance Without Borders: Indigenous casualties of the domestic wars

Borderzone: Militarization, nationalism and migrant hysteria increasing tragedies for Indigenous Peoples

By Jose Matus
Indigenous Alliance Without Borders

TUCSON -- The Southern Border Indigenous Nations continuously face abuse of authority and violation of rights by the current and proposed U.S. anti-immigrant legislation, and border enforcement policies and practice.
The Alianza Indigena Sin Fronteras strongly opposes a permanent U.S. Border Patrol checkpoint on l-19. This permanent checkpoint is just another manifestation of a policy that has hurt Indigenous peoples.
Since 1990, Indigenous peoples on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border have been profoundly and negatively affected by the U.S and Mexican governments’ ongoing domestic "wars:" The War on the Poor, The War on Illegal Immigration, The War on Drugs and now the War on Terrorism.
We are especially concerned about the continuous policy-fueled militarization of the southern border region. This militarization has funneled undocumented migrant traffic into dangerous and environmentally sensitive areas and sacred sites, and brought these domestic wars onto Indigenous borderlands. The safety of Indigenous border residents - including elders, women, and children - is at risk. Our Indigenous human and civil rights are continuously violated by law enforcement’s abuse of authority, as well as by the effects of domestic war policies that deliberately push migrants into specific lethal/tough terrain areas and create desperation, fear, and violence. In addition, the recent Mexican border violence of Caborca, Cananea and other border communities may spill over to Indigenous borderland communities of the Tohono O'odham Nation, Cocopah, Kickapoo, and Kumeyaay, and further compromise Indigenous peoples’ public safety.
For the past 17 years, nationalism, xenophobia, and anti-immigrant hysteria have been on the rise. These attitudes promote and support built-in institutional racism, abuse of authority, and violation of rights. The implementation of anti-immigrant border enforcement policies in our southern borderlands sends a chilling message to both law enforcement officials and civilian “militias”: “If you don't discriminate and violate someone's human/civil rights some of the time, you are not patriotic and/or doing your job.”
This militarized border zone, with its institutional racism and deep disrespect for human and civil rights, has been imposed on the Southern Indigenous peoples and communities. Our Indigenous ways, quality of life, culture, sacred sites and environment have been disrupted. That is what we as Indigenous peoples have been subjected to in the current border war.
For over a decade, the federal government has devoted increasing amounts of money and manpower to fortifying longer stretches of the border in service to its claimed goal of reducing undocumented immigration, drugs and “terrorist threats” from and through Mexico. To date, these efforts have done nothing but create an increase of border violence, border deaths, profitability of people smuggling (particularly from countries other than Mexico) and violations of human rights – all the while redirecting the path of undocumented immigrants and drug/people smugglers through Indigenous borderlands.
Current and proposed enforcement measures will create more violence and division among Indigenous communities. These measures are assaults on our limited sovereignty, self-determination, borderlands and sacred sites. They are not a solution to the challenges we face. To fix our broken immigration system, we must enact legislation that implements protection of Indigenous peoples’ human rights, border rights of mobility and passage, ways of life, cultures, borderlands, and sacred sites. We, Alianza Indigena Sin Fronteras, strongly oppose a permanent I-19 checkpoint.
The Alianza Indigena Sin Fronteras is an affiliate of the Seventh Generation Fund for Indian Development. Founded in 1997, the Alianza’s goal is to promote Indigenous Human/civil rights and border rights, and bring attention to Southern Indigenous border issues.

Jose R. Matus, Project Director
and Ceremonial Leader & member of the Pascua Yaqui Tribe
jrmatus@aol.com
www.indigenasinfronteras.org

Amnesty International: Canada failing Indigenous Peoples

Amnesty urges Canada to withdraw opposition to UN Indigenous Declaration

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL SECRETARIAT
8 June 2007
Ref.: TG AMR 20/2007.01

Prime Minister Hon Stephen Harper
Office of the Prime Minister 80 Wellington Street
Ottawa K1A 0A2 Canada

Dear Prime Minister Harper: I am writing to urge the Government of Canada to withdraw its opposition to the adoption by the UN General Assembly of the vitally important and long overdue UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Canada has long enjoyed an international reputation as a leader in the promotion of human rights. Canada's influence was put to good effect in the final years of negotiation of the Declaration when Canadian representatives were able to bring states and Indigenous peoples together around a common vision of human rights protection. Regrettably, Canada's reversal of its position has had a negative impact on the prospects for the adoption of the Declaration. Although the draft Declaration was adopted by the UN Human Rights Council on June 29 the UN General Assembly went on to call for further "consultation". Today, it is uncertain whether the Declaration will return to the General Assembly later this year for final adoption or will be consigned to an endless cycle of renegotiation. I am concerned, Prime Minister, that a critical opportunity to advance the cause of international human rights is at risk of being lost. According to Canadian government briefing documents, obtained through an Access to Information request, senior Canadian officials who reviewed the final text of the Declaration recommended that Canada support its immediate adoption. Furthermore, these documents state that at one point both the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade and the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs had indicated that they were in favour of its adoption. I note as well that the Declaration has been publicly supported by all three opposition parties in the Canadian Parliament and that the Parliamentary Committee on Aboriginal Affairs has twice called on your government to support the adoption of the Declaration. Given this, it is unclear why your government has persisted in opposing the Declaration. Human rights declarations provide inspiration and guidance to governments, state institutions such as courts, and the public as a whole, but do not directly bind states to specific actions. Drafted to apply to a great diversity of situations around the world, such declarations cannot be interpreted in isolation from other human rights instruments or apart from the context in which they will be applied. The articles in the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples that the Canadian government has objected to, such as the articles on land rights, do not describe absolute or unconditional rights. In their application, these provisions will necessarily be interpreted in relation to all other existing rights and obligations - a fact that Canadian officials previously emphasized when they were working to build support for the Declaration. Claims that the Declaration is incompatible with existing Canadian human rights protections distort the reality of how the Declaration can be reasonably interpreted. But more than that, the suggestion that this demand for basic recognition of Indigenous peoples' rights is excessive, a threat to public interest, or a potential source of conflict, risks playing on and promoting the very prejudice and discrimination the Declaration is intended to counter. Around the world, Indigenous peoples are among the most impoverished, most marginalized, and most frequently victimized sectors of society. Their rights are routinely ignored in favour of wealthier, more powerful interests. This discrimination is cloaked by the racist denigration of Indigenous cultures and the paternalistic claim that non-Indigenous elites know what is best for Indigenous peoples. The Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples presents an inspiring alternative vision of collaboration and reconciliation among Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples working together to advance the rights of all. Implementation of this vision will not be easy. It will be an uphill struggle to undo centuries of prejudice and discrimination, around the world. But that, in fact, has been the goal of this whole long process since the drafting of the Declaration first began more than twenty years ago. I hope that after further deliberation your government will feel able to support the Declaration as adopted by the UN Human Rights Council.
Yours sincerely,
Irene Khan Secretary General

Amnesty International: Canada failing Indigenous Peoples

"The Canadian government has told the United Nations that the situation of Indigenous peoples is “the most pressing human rights issue facing Canadians.” Yet the Canadian government has repeatedly failed to implement UN the recommendations of UN human rights bodies concerning the protection of Indigenous peoples’ rights in Canada . Amnesty International’s work in Canada has included the land rights of the Lubicon Cree, the police shooting of Dudley George, and violence against Indigenous women."
http://www.amnesty.ca/themes/indigenous_overview.php

Amnesty: Stolen sisters, help break the silence:
http://www.amnesty.ca/campaigns/sisters_overview.php